(+3, 3 votes)baltimore’s finest
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
(+3, 3 votes)12 Responses to “baltimore’s finest”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
« funny
True »
February 13th, 2008 at 11:50 pm
He is SO sued!
February 14th, 2008 at 8:54 am
yeah,, it looked a little unnecessary when he powered the kid to the ground.
February 14th, 2008 at 10:11 am
It gets cut off but he is about to say, “If I find myself on youtube….”
That DUDE is probly just pissed he has to ride around in a vehicle thats smaller than he is.
February 14th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
My nerd response to the Duse: The Baltimore Police Dept. will be vicariously liable for any law suit damages because Rivieri was acting within the scope of his employment.
February 14th, 2008 at 6:55 pm
Not necessarily
February 15th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
Huh? Who writes that and doesn’t expand on why? I’m pretty sure what I said is “necessarily” true unless there is some state law that shifting municipal/police liability, which is unlikely. Rivieri may be fired, but the Department will pay for the damages he caused.
February 15th, 2008 at 4:40 pm
Because A) it’s more complicated than that, and B) explaining civ lib litigation pro bono isn’t my style. Plus I don’t work for gays.
February 17th, 2008 at 11:05 pm
Duse - you’re an over-confident moron. This is not about civil liberties. It’s a question of whose pockets will be reached into if a tort such as this goes to court.
February 18th, 2008 at 3:42 am
Oh it’s not about civil liberties son? Wow I must be mad confident son. You fished me out dude I;m fucking sorry. Jesus how could I be so fucking stupid? fuck!!!
February 18th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
Apology accepted
February 18th, 2008 at 10:11 pm
fish fish fish fish fish fish fish fish
February 19th, 2008 at 5:50 pm
yo mama got a glass eye widda fish in it